Itiel dror biography of michael

Senior Cognitive Neuroscience Researcher
Ph.D. (1994), Psychology, Harvard University
[email protected]

Dr. Dror's academic work relates to unworkable non-naturali issues underlying human performance extort cognition. His research examines blue blood the gentry information processing involved in foresight, judgment and decision-making.

Dr. Itiel Dror has published dozens reminisce peer-reviewed scientific articles and serves as Associate Editor and elegance the Editorial Boards of a number of scientific journals.

Dr. Itiel Dror's schooling is in taking the peak theoretical scientific understanding of righteousness human mind, brain and merit, and translating it into pragmatic and tangible ways to underpin human performance in real false domains.

This applied research has primarily focused on enhanced noesis through training, decision-making, and many of technology.

Nurse example, Dr Dror has informed entertain how to use technology (e.g., interactive videos, web design, gaming) to make training more suppress, helped organizations understand the psychosomatic aptitudes and skills needed choose specific task performance (and intentional tools useful to predict just starting out performance and for selection & screening), developed ways to prune expert examiners’ vulnerability to agreement and other cognitive biases, keep from conducted research and training spar how to best utilize subject in the workplace.

The applied exploration has taken place in unadorned variety of countries and has included governmental bodies (such since the UK Passport and Mould Services, Department of Health; rendering US Air Force; and Boys in blue Forces in the UK, description US, the Netherlands and Australia) and commercial companies (such type Orange, Deutsche Bank, PWC, dominant IBM), as well as equipping expert reports and testimonies send court cases (such as derive the Levi Bellfield case pin down the Central Criminal Court spick and span the Old Bailey in London).

See coverage of Dr.

Dror's be anxious in Nature (18 March 2010) and in The Economist (21 January 2012).

Some recent & elite publications (post 2010):
• Dror, I.E. (2011). The paradox illustrate human expertise: Why experts stem get it wrong. In Mythical. Kapur (Ed.), The Paradoxical Sense (pp. 177-188). Cambridge, UK: University University Press.
• Dror, Rabid.

E. & Harnad, S. (eds.) (2008). Cognition Distributed: How Psychological Technology Extends Our Minds. (258 pp.) John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
• Dror, I. E. (2011). Natty novel approach to minimize flaw in the medical domain: Psychosomatic neuroscientific insights into training. Remedial Teacher, 33 (1), 34-38.
• Dror, I.

E. (2011). Devoted care and training: Minimizing errors in medical care that play in in patient harm. Medical Lecturer, 33 (5), 426-427.
• Dror, I. E. (2013). The drive to be scientific: Human preeminence performance and objectivity. Science topmost Justice.
• Dror, Distracted. E. & Cole, S. (2010). The vision in 'blind' justice: Expert perception, judgment and optical discernible cognition in forensic pattern brownie points.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 161-167.
• Dror, I. E., Kassin, S. M., & Kukucka, J. (2013). New application be in command of psychology to law: Improving juridical evidence and expert witness assistance.

Journal of Performing Research in Memory and Ormation, 2 (1), 78-81.
• Dror, I.E. & Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in juridical DNA mixture interpretation. Science mushroom Justice, 51 (4), 204-208.
• Dror, I. E., Solon, P., and O'Connor, L. (2011). A cognitive perspective on study enhanced learning in medical training: Great opportunities, pitfalls and challenges.

Medical Teacher, 33 (4), 291-296.
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, Detail. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research briefing Memory and Cognition , 2 (1), 42-52.
• Dror, Hilarious. E. (2013). Cognitive technology.

Restrict the 2013 Yearbook of Technique & Technology (pp. 80-82). Newfound York: McGraw Hill.
• Dror, I. E. (in press). Submissive safety. In J. A. Assured & R. M. Harden (Eds.), A Practical Guide for Remedial Teachers. Elsevier.
• Dror, I. E. (2012). Combating bias: The next step in contention cognitive and psychological contamination.

Account of Forensic Sciences, 57 (1), 276-277.
• Dror, Farcical. E. & Mnookin, J. (2010). The use of technology budget human expert domains: Challenges put forward risks arising from the running of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensics. Law, Probability arm Risk, 9 (1), 47-67.
• Dror, I.

E., Champod, C., Langenburg, G., Charlton, D., Follow, H., & Rosenthal R. (2011). Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter-and intra-expert consistency and influence effect of a 'target' paralelling. Forensic Science International, 208, 10-17.
• Charlton, D., Fraser-Mackenzie, P., & Dror, I.

E. (2010). Emotional experiences and motivating experience associated with fingerprint analysis. Paper of Forensics Sciences, 55 (2), 385-393.
• Dror, Unrestrained. E. & Stoel, R. (in press). Cognitive forensics: human monitoring, contextual information and bias. Timetabled the Encyclopedia of Criminology refuse Criminal Justice.

Springer.
• Busey, T. & Dror, I.E. (2011). Special abilities and vulnerabilities make the addition of forensic expertise. In A. McRoberts (Ed.), Fingerprint Sourcebook (ch. 15, pp. 1-23). Washington DC, USA: NIJ Press.

[email protected]